В статье рассматриваются адаптивная и генеративная модели процесса воспитания лидеров, выделенные автором в рамках парадигмального подхода. Выявленные различия, взаимосвязь и необходимость гармоничного сочетания данных моделей выступают ориентирами для дальнейшего анализа подходов к процессу воспитания лидеров не только с социально-исторической точки зрения, но и с позиции их педагогического содержания.
1. Argyris C. Education for leading-learning // Organizational Dynamics. 1993. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 5-17.
2. Argyris C. On Organizational Learning. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing, 1999. 464 p.
3. Argyris C. Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines. MA: Pitman, 1985. 386 p.
4. Bruner J. The Culture of Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996. 224 p.
5. Carneiro P. R. The Quest for a New Learning Paradigm // Unicorn: Journal of the Australian College of Education. 2000. No. 26 (3). P. 26-33.
6. Daft R. L. The leadership experience. Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Pub, 2007. 528 p.
7. Day D., Gronn P. C., Salas E. Leadership capacity in teams // The Leadership Quarterly. 2004. No. 15 (6). P. 857-880.
8. Foster R. Leadership in the Twenty-first century: Working to build a civil society // National Civic Review. 2000. No. 89 (1). P. 87-93.
9. Gronn P. C. The New Work of Educational Leaders: Changing Leadership Practice in an Era of School Reform. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 2003. 176 p.
10. Reed G. Mapping the route of leadership education: caution ahead // PARAMETERS. 2004. Vol. XXXIV. No. 3. P. 46-60.
11. Rost J. C. Leadership for the 21st Century. Westport. CT: Praeger, 1991. 220 p.
12. Steiner C. J., Gaskin P. Educating leaders: From the abstract and rational to the concrete and personal // The Journal of Leadership Studies. 1998. No. 5 (2). P. 83-102.
13. Senge P. M. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House. 1990. 424 p.
