Статья
СТРАТЕГИИ ОНЛАЙН-ПОИСКА ИНФОРМАЦИИ КАК ПРЕДМЕТ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ: ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКАЯ МОДЕЛЬ
В статье раскрываются возможности психологического анализа феномена «стратегии информационного онлайн-поиска». На основе обзора литературы предложена модель феномена «стратегии информационного онлайн-поиска», описывающая его процессуальные и результирующие характеристики. Процессуальные характеристики раскрыты в единстве внешнего (действенного) и внутреннего (метакогнитивного) аспектов реализации информационно-поисковой онлайн-активности. Предложенная модель может операционализироваться в соответствии с задачами конкретного психологического исследования.
1. Горюнова Л. Н., Круглова М. А., Провоторова Я. А., Цыган В. Н. Стратегии информационного поиска и их взаимосвязь с личностными особенностями студентов // Петербургский психологический журнал. 2013. № 2. С. 1-15.
2. Плигин А. А. Познавательные стратегии школьников. От индивидуализации - к личностно-ориентированному образованию. М.: Твои книги, 2012. 416 с.
3. Фрумкин К. Г. Клиповое мышление и судьба линейного текста // Топос: литературно-философский журнал. 2010. № 9. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.topos.ru/article/7371 (дата обращения: 30.01.2020).
4. Argelagоs E., Pifarrе M. Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 515-526. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.024
5. Aula A., Nordhausen K. Modeling successful performance in web searching // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. Vol. 57. P. 1678-1693. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20340
6. Beal C. R., Stevens R. H. Improving students' problem solving in a web-based chemistry simulation through embedded metacognitive messages // Technology, Instrumentation, Cognition and Learning. 2011. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 255-271.
7. Bhavnani S. K., Drabenstott K. M., Radev D. R. Towards a unified framework of IR tasks and strategies // Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting. 2001. Vol. 38. P. 340-354.
8. Bowler L. A taxonomy of adolescent metacognitive knowledge during the information search process // Library & Information Science Research. 2010. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 27-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2009.09.005
9. Brand-Gruwel S., Walraven A., Boshuizen H. Information-problem solving: A review of problems students encounter and instructional solutions // Computers in Human Behavior. 2008. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 623-648. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.030
10. Brand-Gruwel S., Wopereis I., Walraven A. A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet // Computers & Human Behavior. 2009. Vol. 53. No. 4. P. 1207-1217. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004
11. Bromme R., Pieschl S., Stahl E. Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: a functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition // Metacognition and learning. 2010. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 7-26. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
12. Bruner J. S., Goodnow J. J., Austin G. A. A study of thinking. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1956. 330 p.
13. Byström K., Järvelin K. Task complexity affects information seeking and use // Information Processing & Management. 1995. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 191-213. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4573(95)80035-R
14. Crescenzi A. Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in time-constrained in information search // Search as Learning. 2016. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1647/SAL2016_paper_5.pdf (дата обращения: 30.01.2020).
15. David P., Song M., Hayes A. F., Fredin E. S. A cyclic model of information seeking in hyperlinked environments: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation // International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2007. Vol. 65. P. 170-182. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.004
16. Drabenstott K. M. Web search strategy development // Online. 2001. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 18-27.
17. Eyesenbach G., Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and indepth interviews // British Medical Journal. 2002. Vol. 324. P. 573-577. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573
18. Flavell J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive - developmental inquiry // American Psychologist. 1979. Vol. 34. No. 10. P. 906-911. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
19. Gagniиre L., Betrancourt M., Détienne F. When metacognitive prompts help information search in collaborative setting // European Review of Applied Psychology. 2012. Vol. 62. No. 2. P. 73-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2011.12.005
20. Gerjets P., Kammerer Y., Werner B. Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data // Learning and Instruction. 2011. Vol. 21. P. 220-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.005
21. Graesser A. C., Wiley J., Goldman S. R., O'Reilly T., Jeon M., McDaniel B. SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption // Metacognition and Learning. 2007. Vol. 2. No. 2-3. P. 89-105. DOI: 10.1007/s11409-007-9013-x
22. Guinee K., Eagleton M. B., Hall T. E. Adolescents' internet search strategies: Drawing upon familiar cognitive paradigms when accessing electronic information sources // Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2003. Vol. 29. No. 3. P. 363-374. DOI: 10.2190/HD0A-N15L-RTFH-2DU8
23. Head A., Eisenberg M. How college students use the web to conduct everyday life research // First Monday. 2011. Vol. 16. No. 4. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2281533 (дата обращения: 03.02.2020).
24. Heinstrom J. Fast surfers, broad scanners, deep divers. Personality and information-seeking behaviour. Doctoral dissertation. Turku: Еbo Academi University Press, 2002. 284 р.
25. Hofer B. K. Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive Process: Thinking aloud during online searching // Educational Psychologist. 2004. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 43-55. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
26. Hölscher C., Strube G. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies // Computer Networks. 2000. Vol. 33. P. 337-346. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-1286(00)00031-1
27. Huertas-Bustos A., Lуpez-Vargas O., Sanabria-Rodríguez L. Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on information web search // Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 91-106.
28. Kammerer Y., Amann D. G., Gerjets P. When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation intervention // Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. Vol. 48. P. 297-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.045
29. Kirkpatrick L. C., Klein P. D. High-achieving high school students' strategies for writing from Internetbased sources of information // Journal of Writing Research. 2016. Vol. 8. P. 1-47. DOI: 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.01
30. Kitajima M., Blackmon M. H., Polson P. G. A comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to web usability analysis // People and computers XIV - usability or else! / ed. by S. McDonald, Y. Waern, G. Cockton. London: Springer-Verlag, 2000. P. 357-373.
31. Knight S., Rienties B., Littleton K., Mitsui M., Tempelaar D. T., Shah C. The relationship of (perceived) epistemic cognition to interaction with resources on the internet // Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. Vol. 73. P. 507-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.014
32. Kuhkthau C. C. Accommodating the user's information search process: Challenges for information retrieval system designers // Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 1999. Vol. 25. No. 3. P. 12-16. DOI: 10.1002/bult.115
33. Kuo F. R., Chen N. S., Hwang G. J. A creative thinking approach to enhancing the web-based problem solving performance of university students // Computers & Education. 2014. Vol. 72. P. 220-230. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.005
34. Li Y., Yu C., Jinghong L., Yuan C., Xuan W., Ping C., Qianqian W. Measuring task complexity in information search from user's perspective // Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 1-8.
35. Lu W., Jia Y. An eye-tracking study of user behavior in web image search // PRICAI 2014: Trends in artificial intelligence. Lecture notes in computer science / ed. by D. N. Pham, S. B. Park. Vol. 8862. Cham: Springer, 2014. P. 170-182. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13560-1_14
36. Marchionini G. Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 236 p. DOI: 10.2307/40324289
37. Monchaux S., Amadieu F., Chevalier A., Marine C. Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved. Information // Processing and Management. 2015. Vol. 51. P. 557-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.05.004
38. Navarro-Prieto R., Scaife M., Rogers Y. Cognitive strategies in web searching // Proceedings of the 5th Conference on human factors and the web gaithersburg. Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999. P. 43-56.
39. Pfaffenberger B. Web search strategies. New York: MIS Press, 1996. 456 p.
40. Pirolli P., Card S. K. Information foraging // Psychological Review. 1999. Vol. 106. P. 643-675.
41. Pressley M., Harris K. R. Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction // Handbook of educational psychology / ed. by P. A. Alexander, P. Winne. New York: MacMillan, 2006. P. 265-286.
42. Purcell K., Brenner J., Raine L. Search engine use 2012. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2012/PI P_Search_Engine_Use_2012.pdf (дата обращения: 25.05.2020).
43. Qu P., Liu C., Lai M. The effect of task type and topic familiarity on information search behaviors // IIiX‘10: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010. P. 371-376. DOI: 10.1145/1840784.1840841
44. Roscoe R. D., Grebitus C., O'Brian J., Johnson A. C., Kula I. Online information search and decision making: Effects of web search stance // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 56. P. 103-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.028
45. Scott T. J., O'Sullivan M. K. Analyzing student search strategies: Making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum // Teacher Librarian. 2005. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 21-25.
46. Sharit J., Taya J., Berkowsky R., Czaja S. Online information search performance and search strategies in a health problem-solving scenario // Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 211-228. D0I: 10.1177/1555343415583747
47. Singer G., Danilov D., Norbisrath U. Complex search: Aggregation, Discovery, and Synthesis // Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. 2012. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 89-106. DOI: 10.3176/proc.2012.2.02
48. Singer G., Norbisrath U., Lewandowski D. Ordinary search engine users carrying out complex search tasks // Journal of Information Science. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 346-358. DOI: 10.1177/0165551512466974
49. Spool J. M., Scanlon T., Schroeder W., Snyder C., DeAngelo T. Web site usability: A designer's guide. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1999. 176 p.
50. Sun C., Ye S., Hsieh H. Effects of student characteristics and question design on Internet search results usage in a Taiwanese classroom // Computers and Education. 2014. Vol. 77. P. 134-144.
51. Sünkler S., Lewandowski D. Does it matter which search engine is used? A user study using post-task relevance judgments // Proceedings of the 80th Annual meeting of the association of information science and technology. Crystal City: Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017. P. 405-414. DOI: 10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401044
52. Tsai M.-J., Tsai C.-C. Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy // Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2003. Vol. 40. P. 43-50. DOI: 10.1080/1355800032000038822
53. Tseng J., Tjondronegoro D., Spink A. Analysing web multimedia query reformulation behaviour // Proceedings of the 14th Australasian document computing symposium / ed. by J. Kay, P. Thomas, A. Trotman. Sydney: University of Sydney, 2009. P. 1-8.
54. Voiskounsky A. E. The Internet as a space of knowledge: psychological aspects of hypertext structures // Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 7-20. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2017060401
55. Walhout J., Oomen P., Jarodzka H., Brand-Gruwel S. Effects of task complexity on online search behavior of adolescents // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 68. P. 1449-1461. DOI:10.1002/asi.23782
56. Walraven A., Brand-Gruwel S., Boshuizen H. Fostering students' evaluation behaviour while searching the internet // Instructional Science. 2013. Vol. 41. No. 1. P. 125-146. DOI:10.1007/s11251-012-9221-x
57. Westerwick A. Effects of sponsorship, web site design, and Google ranking on the credibility of online information // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2013. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 80-97. DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12006
58. Wickens C. D., Lee J. D., Liu Y., Becker S. E. An introduction to human factors engineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004. 608 p.
59. Wildemuth B. M., Freund L., Toms E. Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies // Journal of Documentation. 2014. Vol. 70. P. 1118-1140. DOI: 10.1108/JD-03-2014-0056
60. Wilson T. D. Information seeking behaviour and the digital information world // European Science Editing. 2004. Vol. 30. N o. 3. P. 77-81.
61. Wu Y.-T., Tsai C.-C. Information commitments: Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments // Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2005. Vol. 1. P. 374-385. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00144.x
62. Zhou M. A systematic understanding of successful web searches in information-based tasks // Educational Technology & Society. 2013. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 321-331.
63. Zhou M., Lam K. Metacognitive scaffolding for online information search in K-12 and higher education settings: A systematic review // Education Tech Research. 2019. Vol. 67. P. 1353-1384. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-019-09646-7
64. Zion M., Adler I., Mevarech Z. The effect of individual and social metacognitive support on students'metacognitive performances in an online discussion // Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2015. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 50-87. DOI: 10.1177/0735633114568855