Статья
КРОВНОРОДСТВЕННАЯ ОПЕКУНСКАЯ СЕМЬЯ В ПЕРИОД ПОСТОПЕКИ: АНАЛИЗ ЗАРУБЕЖНЫХ ИСТОЧНИКОВ
В настоящей статье проводится аналитический обзор современных зарубежных теоретических и эмпирических исследований по проблеме психологических особенностей кровнородственных опекунских семей. Следует отметить, что среди зарубежных исследований замещающих семей кровнородственные опекунские семьи изучаются довольно редко. Вместе с тем, замещающие семьи, где опекуном/попечителем становится один из родственников ребенка, практически не изучены. Зарубежные исследования опекунских семей часто сосредоточены на изучении отдельных аспектов, таких как адаптация детей-сирот к замещающей семье, коммуникативная открытость, удовлетворенность контактами, показатель общего благополучия и другие, но отсутствует системный анализ семьи в период постопеки и рассмотрения ее как особой жизненной ситуации.
1. Barth R. P. Disruption in older child adoption // Public Welfare. 1988. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 23-29.
2. Benson P. L., Sharma A. R., Roehlkepartain E. C. Growing up adopted: A portrait of adolescents and their families. Minneapolis: Search Institute Publ., 1994. 128 p.
3. Berry M., Propp J., Martens P. The use of family preservation services with adoptive families // Child and Family Social Work. 2007. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00426.x
4. Campbell J., Handy J. Bound to care: Custodial grandmothers' experiences of double bind family relationships // Feminism and Psychology. 2011. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 431-439.
5. Courtney M. E., Dworsky A., Ruth G., Keller T. E., Havlicek J. et al. Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 19. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago Publ., 2005. 75 p.
6. Davis M. T., Warfeld M. E., Boguslaw J., Roundtree-Swain D., Kellogg G. Parenting a 6-year old is not what I planned in retirement: Trauma and stress among grandparents due to the opioid crisis // Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2020. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1752872
7. Festinger T. Adoption and after: Adoptive parents' service needs // The postadoption experience: Adoptive families' service needs and service outcomes / ed. by M. M. Dore. Washington: CWLA Press, 2006. P. 17-44.
8. Festinger T. After adoption: Dissolution or permanence? // Child Welfare. 2002. Vol. 81. No. 3. P. 515-533.
9. Fučík P., Janků K. S. The challenges and paradoxes of kinship foster care in a socially excluded locality // Socialni Prace. 2019. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 44-61.
10. Garwood M. M., Williams S. C. Differing effects of family finding service on permanency and family connectedness for children new to versus lingering in the foster care system // Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2015.1008619
11. Grotevant H. D., Rueter M., Von Korff L., Gonzalez C. Post-adoption contact, adoption communicative openness, and satisfaction with contact as predictors of externalizing behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2011. Vol. 52. No. 5. P. 529-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02330.x
12. Hanna M., Tokarski K., Matera D., Fong R. Happy ever after? The journey from foster care to adoption // Adoption Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2011.560789
13. Hedin L. A sense of belonging in a changeable everyday life - a follow-up study of young people in kinship, network, and traditional foster families // Child and Family Social Work. 2014. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00887.x
14. Jones A. M., Morris T. L. Psychological adjustment of children in foster care: Review and implications for best practice // Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2012. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2011.617272
15. Knuiman S., Rijk C. H., Hoksbergen R. A., van Baar A. L. Children without parental care in Poland: Foster care, institutionalization and adoption // International Social Work. 2015. Vol. 58. No. 1. P. 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812473138
16. Liao M. Factors affecting post-permanency adjustment for children in adoption or guardianship placements: An ecological systems analysis // Children and Youth Services Review. 2016. Vol. 66. P. 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.05.009
17. McRoy R. G. Special needs adoptions: Practice issues. New York: Garland Publ., 1999. 275 p.
18. Messing J. T. From the child's perspective: A qualitative analysis of kinship care placements // Children and Youth Services Review. 2006. Vol. 28. No. 12. P. 1415-1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006. 03.001
19. Nixon P. Relatively speaking: Developments in research and practice in kinship care. Dartington: Research in Practice Publ., 2007. 118 p.
20. Pecora P. J. Why current and former foster recipients of foster care need high quality mental health services // Administrative Policy in Mental Health. 2010. Vol. 37. P. 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0295-y
21. Pérez A. G. Are we putting the cart before the horse? Understanding legal and relational permanence among young adults with foster care histories: PhD dissertation (Psychology). Chicago, 2014. [Online]. Available at: https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/research/scholar/phd/access/recent-dissertations/autumn-2014/(accessed 17.02.2023).
22. Perry B. D. Traumatized children: How childhood trauma influences brain development // The Journal of the California Alliance for the Mentally III. 2000. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 48-51.
23. Reilly T., Platz L. Characteristics and challenges of families who adopt children with special needs: An empirical study // Children and Youth Services Review. 2003. Vol. 25. No. 10. P. 781-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(03)00079-3
24. Rolock N. Post-permanency continuity: What happens after adoption and guardianship from foster care? // Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732. 2015.1021986
25. Rolock N., Pérez A. G. Three sides to a foster care story: An examination of the lived experiences of young adults, their foster care case record, and the space in between // Qualitative Social Work. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 195-215 https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016666410
26. Rolock N., White K. R. Post-permanency discontinuity: A longitudinal examination of outcomes for foster youth after adoption or guardianship // Children and Youth Services Review. 2016. Vol. 70. P. 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.10.025
27. Rolock N., White K. R. Continuity for children after guardianship versus adoption with kin: Approximating the right counterfactual // Child Abuse & Neglect. 2017. Vol. 72. P. 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.001
28. Rosenthal J. A., Groze V. K. Special-needs adoption: A study of intact families // Social Service Review. Vol. 64. No. 3. P. 475-505. https://doi.org/10.1086/603782
29. Rushton A., Dance C. The outcomes of late permanent placements: The adolescent years // Adoption and Fostering. 2004. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590402800107
30. Ryan S. D., Nalavany R. Adopted children: Who do they turn to for help and why? // Adoption Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 29-52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J145v07n02_03
31. Samuels G. M. A reason, a season, or a lifetime: Relational permanence among young adults with foster care backgrounds. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago Publ., 2008. 92 p.
32. Selwyn J. Post-adoption support and interventions for adoptive families: Best practice approaches. Munich: German Research Center on Adoption Publ., 2017. 54 p.
33. Simmel C., Barth R. P., Brooks D. Adopted foster youths' psychosocial functioning: A longitudinal perspective // Child and Family Social Work. 2007. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00481.x.
34. Testa M. F. The quality of permanence: Lasting or binding? Subsidized guardianship and kinship foster care as alternatives to adoption // Virginia Journal of Social Policy & Law. 2005. Vol. 12. P. 499-534.
35. Testa M. F., Snyder S. M., Wu Q., Rolock N., Liao M. Adoption and guardianship: A moderated mediation analysis of predictors of post-permanency continuity // American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2015. Vol. 85. No. 2. P. 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000019
36. Thomas L. J., Scharp K. M. "A family for every child": Discursive constructions of "ideal" adoptive families in online foster adoption photolistings that promote adoption of children from foster care // Adoption Quarterly. 2017. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2016.1263261
37. White K. R. Placement discontinuity for older children and adolescents who exit foster care through adoption or guardianship: A systematic review // Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2016. Vol. 33. P. 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-015-0425-1
38. White K. R., Rolock N., Marra L., Faulkne M., Ocasio K. et al. Understanding wellbeing and care-giver commitment after adoption or guardianship from foster care // Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2021. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2020.1850601
39. Wilson S. L. A current review of adoption research: Exploring individual differences in adjustment // Children and Youth Services Review. 2004. Vol. 26. No. 8. P. 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childy-outh.2004.02.013
40. Wright L., Flynn C. C. Adolescent adoption: Success despite challenges // Children and Youth Services Review. 2006. Vol. 28. No. 5. P. 487-510.
41. Xu Y., Jedwab M., Lee K. A., Levkoff S. E. The negative effects of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on behavioral problems of children in kinship care: The protective role of kinship caregivers' mental health // Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2023. Vo l. 31. No. 1. P. 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266221076475