Глава книги
Современные подходы к обучению школьников навыкам эффективного онлайн-поиска учебной информации
1. Воробьева С.В. Критическое мышление: взаимодействие логических, эпистемологических и когнитивных факторов // Философия и социальные науки. 2015. № 1. С. 67-71.
2. Выготский Л.С. Мышление и речь. М.: Лабиринт, 1999. 352 с.
3. Микляева А.В. Онлайн-поиск дополнительной информации как элемент образовательной активности современных школьников: как сделать его эффективнее? // Цифровая гума-нитаристика и технологии в образовании (DHTE 2021): сб. статей II-й Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным участием/ Под ред. В.В. Рубцова, М.Г. Сороковой, Н.П. Радчиковой. М.: Издательство ФГБОУ ВО МГППУ, 2021. 779 с. С. 609-620.
4. Ackerman R., Lauterman T. Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012.Vol. 28.No. 5. Pp. 1816-1828. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
5. AlDahdouh, A.A. Information search behavior in fragile and conflict-affected learning contexts. Internet and Higher Education. 2021.Vol. 50 P. 100808. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100808
6. An Y.-J., Li C. Examining the Effects of Metacognitive Scaffolding on Students' Design Problem Solving and Metacognitive Skills in an Online Environment // MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 4. Pp. 552-567.
7. Argelagоs E., Pifarrе M. Improving information problem solving skills in secondary education through embedded instruction // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. Vol.28. Pp.515-526. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.024
8. Aula A., Nordhausen K. Modeling successful performance in web searching // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2006. Vol. 57. Pp.1678-1693. doi: 10.1002/asi.20340
9. Bana A. Students’ Perception of Using the Internet to Develop Reading Habits: A Case Study at the English Education Department of Universitas Kristen Indonesia // Journal of English Teaching. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 60-70. doi: 10.33541/jet.v6i1.46
10. Beal C.R., Stevens, R.H. Improving students’ problem solving in a web-based chemistry simulation through embedded metacognitive messages // Technology, Instrumentation, Cognition and Learning. 2001. Vol.8. Pp.255-271.
11. Berkowitz R., Eisenberg M. Curriculum initiative: an agenda and strategy forlibrary media programs. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1988. 196 p.
12. Byström K., Järvelin K. Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use // Information Processing & Management. 1995. Vol. 31. Pp. 191-213. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(95)80035-R
13. Canan Güngören Ö., Erdoğan D.G. Uyanık G.K. Examination of Preservice Teachers’ Lifelong Learning Trends by Online Information Searching Strategies // Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 4. Pp. 60-80. doi: 10.17220/mojet.2019.04.005
14. David P., Song M., Hayes A.F., Fredin E.S. A cyclic model of information seeking in hyper-linked environments: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation // International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2007. Vol. 65. Pp. 170-182. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.09.004
15. Gerjets P., Kammerer Y., Werner B. Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data // Learning and Instruction. 2011. Vol.21. Pp.220-231. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.005
16. Graesser A.C., Wiley J., Goldman S.R., O’Reilly T., Jeon M., McDaniel B. SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption // Metacognition and Learning. 2007. Vol. 2. Pp.89-105. doi: 10.1007/s11409-007-9013-x
17. Greene J.A., Azevedo R. A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system //Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2009. Vol. 34. Pp. 18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.006
18. Hahnel C., Goldhammer F., Kröhne U., NaumannJ. The role of reading skills in the evaluation of online information gathered from search engine environments // Computers in Human Behavior. 2018. Vol. 78. Pp. 223-234.
19. Hämäläinen E.K., Kiili C., Marttunen M., Räikkönen E., González-Ibáñez R., LeppänenP.H. Promoting sixth graders’ credibility Evaluation of Web pages: An intervention study // Computers in Human Behavior. 2020. Vol. 110. P. 106372. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106372
20. Hofer B.K. Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching // EducationalPsychologist. 2004. Vol. 39 (1). Pp. 43-55. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5;
21. Hope A. Internet pollution discourses, exclusionary practices and the ‘culture of over-blocking’ within UK schools // Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 2008. Vol. 17(2). Pp. 103-113. doi: 10.1080/14759390802098599
22. Howland J.L., Jonassen D., MarraR.M. Meaningful learning with technology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson, 2012. 292 p.
23. Huertas-Bustos A., López-Vargas O., Sanabria-Rodríguez L.Effect of a Metacognitive Scaffolding on Information Web Search // The Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2018. Vol. 16 (2). Pp. 91-106.
24. Iyengar S.S., Lepper M.R. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2020.Vol. 79(6). Pp. 995-1006. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
25. Jonassen D.H., Howland J., Moore J., Marra R.M. Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective (2nd ed.). UpperSaddleRiver, NJ: Prentice-Hall., 2003.
26. Jumaat N.F., Tasir Z. Instructional Scaffolding in Online Learning Environment: A Meta-Analysis // International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering. 2014. Pp. 74-77. doi:10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.22
27. Kammerer Y., Amann D.G., Gerjets P. When adults without university education search the Internet for health information: The roles of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs and a source evaluation intervention // Computers in Human Behavior. 2015. Vol.48. Pp.297-309. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.045
28. Kurt A.A., Emiroglu B.G. Analysis of Students’ Online Information Searching Strategies, Exposure to Internet Information Pollution and Cognitive Absorption Levels Based on Various Variables // Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2018. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 18-29.
29. Lüftenegger M., Finsterwald M., Klug J., Bergsmann E., van de Schoot R., Schober B., Wagner P. Fostering pupils’ lifelong learning competencies in the classroom: evaluation of a training programme using a multivariate multilevel growth curve approach // European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2016. Vol. 13. Pp. 719-736. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2015.1077113
30. Macedo-Rouet M., Potocki A., Scharrer L., Ros C., Stadtler M., Salmerón L., RouetJ.F. How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on adolescents’ evaluation of web information quality // Reading Research Quarterly. 2019. Vol. 54. No. 3. Pp. 299-321. doi:10.1002/rrq.241
31. Miklyaeva A.V., Bezgodova S.A. Educational Online Activity in Adolescents with Various Academic Achievements // ARPHA Proceedings. 2020. Vol.3. Pp. 1629-1638. doi: 10.3897/ap.2.e1629
32. Molenaar I., van Boxtel C., Sleegers P.Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement // Instructional Science. 2011. Vol.39. Pp. 785-803.
33. Monchaux S., Amadieu F., Chevalier A., Marine C. Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved // Information, Processing and Management. 2015. Vol. 51. Pp.557-569. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.05.004
34. Park J.H., Park M. Smartphone use patterns and problematic smartphone use among preschool children //PLoS ONE. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 1-12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244276
35. Quintana C., Zhang M.,Krajcik J. A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding //Educational Psychologist. 2005. Vol. 40.Pp. 235-244.
36. Raes A., Schellens T., De Wever B., Vanderhoven E. Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning // Computers & Education. 2012. Vol. 59(1). Pp. 82-94.
37. Roscoe R.D., Grebitus C., O’Brian J., Johnson A.C., Kula I. Online information search and decision making: Effects of web search stance // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. Vol. 56. Pp. 103-118. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.028
38. Sanchiz M., Chin, J., Chevalier A., Fu W.T., Amadieu F., He J. Searching for information on the web: Impact of cognitive aging, prior domain knowledge and complexity of the search problems // Information Processing & Management. 2017. Vol. 53. No. 1. Pp. 281-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.09.003
39. Schacter J., Chung G.K., Dorr A. Children’s internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analyses // Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1998. Vol. 49. No. 9. Pp. 840-849. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199807)49:9<840::aid-asi9>3.0.co;2-d
40. Scott T.J., O’Sullivan M.K. Analyzing student search strategies: Making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum // Teacher Librarian. 2005. Vol.33. Pp.21-25.
41. Şendurur E., Yıldırım Z. Students’ Web Search Strategies With Different Task Types: An Eye-Tracking Study // International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2015. Vol. 31. Pp. 101-111.doi:10.1080/10447318.2014.959105
42. Şendurur E., Yıldırım Z. Web-Based Metacognitive Scaffolding for Internet Search // Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2018. Vol. 0(0). Pp. 1-23. doi: 10.1177/0047239518803291
43. Song X., Liu C., Zhang Y. Chinese college students’ source selection and use in searching for health-related information online // Information Processing and Management. 2021. Vol. 58. P. 58102489. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102489
44. Sørenssen I.K., Bergschöld J.M. Domesticated Smartphones in Early Childhood Education and Care settings. Blurring the lines between pedagogical and administrative use // International Journal of Early Years Education. 2021. Vol. 3. Pp. 1-14. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2021.1893157
45. Sun C., Ye S., Hsieh H. Effects of student characteristics and question design on Internet search results usage in a Taiwanese classroom // Computers and Education. 2014. Vol. 77. Pp. 134-144.
46. Tsai Р.-S., Tsai C.-C., Hwang G.-J. The correlates of Taiwan teachers' epistemological beliefs concerning Internet environments, online search strategies, and search outcomes // The Internet and Higher Education. 2011. Vol. 14 (1). Pp. 54-63.doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.003
47. Tseng S.C., Liang J.-C., Tsai C.-C. Students' self-regulated learning, online information evaluative standards and online academic searching strategies // Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2014. Vol. 30. No. 1. Pp. 106-121. doi: 10.14742/ajet.242
48. Tuluk G., Kepceoglu I. Pre-Service Teachers’ Web Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Online Information Searching Strategies // International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2019. Vol. 8(2). Pp. 229-236. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18771
49. van De Pol J., Volman M.,Beishuizen J.Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research // Educational Psychology Review. 2010. Vol. 22. No. 3. Pp. 271-296.
50. Ward A.F.,Duke K., Gneezy A., Bos M. Brain drain: the mere presence of one’s own smart-phone reduces available cognitive capacity // Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. 2017. Vol. 2 (2). P. 140-154.
51. Way J., Rowe L. The role of scaffolding in the design of multimedia learning object // Proceedings of 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Monterrey, Mexico: ICMI, 2008. Pp. 6-13.
52. Wilson T.D. Information seeking behaviour and the digital information world // European Science Editing. 2004. Vol.30. Pp.77-81.
53. Wolf S.E., Brush T., Saye J. Using an information problem-solving model as a metacognitive scaffold for multimedia-supported information-based problems // Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2003. Vol. 35(3). Pp. 321-341.
54. Zhou M. A systematic understanding of successful web searches in information-based tasks // Educational Technology & Society. 2013. Vol.16. Pp.321-331.
55. Zhou M.,Lam K.K. Metacognitive scaffolding for online information search in K-12 and higher education settings: a systematic review // Educational Technology Research and Development. 2019. Vol. 67. Pp. 1353-1384.
56. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia O., Beck K., Fischer J., Braunheim D., Schmidt S., Shavelson R.J. The role of students’ beliefs when critically reasoning from multiple contradictory sources of information in performance assessments // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 2192. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02192